ujeebu
vs
Ujeebu vs ScrapingDog
ScrapingDog is a low-cost, high-volume scraping API with a broad menu of specialized endpoints. Ujeebu plays in the same space but adds depth: per-success billing, one credit pool across scrape, SERP, AI extraction, screenshots and PDF, dedicated content extraction and an MCP server, all on a more polished platform.
Key differences.
Cost, side by side.
| Pricing model | Ujeebu | ScrapingDog |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 (5,000 credits, no card) | $0 (1,000 credits, 30-day trial) |
| Entry | $49/mo (300K credits) | $40/mo (Lite, 200K credits) |
| Mid | $119/mo (1M credits) | $90/mo (Standard, 1M credits) |
| Scale | $299/mo (3M credits) | $200/mo (Pro, 3M credits) |
ScrapingDog's Lite plan starts at $40/mo, just under Ujeebu's $49 entry tier, and runs cheaper for raw scraping volume. Compare on what you actually need: Ujeebu credits cover scrape, SERP, AI extraction, screenshots and PDF on one pool, scale with the work done, and failed requests are free.
Feature by feature.
| Feature | Ujeebu | ScrapingDog |
|---|---|---|
| JavaScript rendering | Yes | Yes |
| Residential proxies | Yes (100+ countries) | Yes (40M+ pool) |
| Geotargeting | Yes | Yes |
| CAPTCHA solving | Built-in | Built-in |
| Google SERP API | Yes (structured, included) | Yes (dedicated, plus News/Maps) |
| Article / content extraction | Yes (dedicated endpoint) | Partial (LLM-ready output, no article endpoint) |
| AI / LLM extraction | Yes (Auto Extract + AI Scraper) | Yes (LLM-ready output) |
| Screenshots | Yes | Yes |
| PDF output | Yes | No (PNG only) |
| MCP server | Yes | No |
| Per-success billing | Yes (failed requests free) | Yes |
An honest look at each.
ujeebu- One credit pool across scraping, SERP, AI extraction, screenshots and PDF
- AI-native tooling: Auto Extract, AI Scraper and an MCP server
- Dedicated article and content extraction endpoint
- Per-success billing: failed and blocked requests are free
- Entry plan is slightly higher than ScrapingDog's Lite tier
- Smaller residential proxy pool
- Newer brand than some incumbents
- Low entry price at $40/mo
- Large 40M+ residential proxy pool
- Dedicated Google SERP, News and Maps APIs
- Built-in CAPTCHA solving and geotargeting
- Broad menu of specialized scraping endpoints
- No dedicated article or content extraction endpoint
- No MCP server for AI agents
- PNG screenshots only, no PDF output
- Documentation and UX feel less polished than premium rivals
We do our best to keep this comparison accurate and up-to-date. If you notice any discrepancies, please let us know.
Our take: ScrapingDog for low-cost volume, Ujeebu for depth and AI tooling
ScrapingDog is a solid budget choice, and for high-volume raw scraping its $40 entry tier is genuinely cheap. Ujeebu costs a little more to start but gives you more for it: per-success billing, one credit pool across scrape, SERP, AI extraction, screenshots and PDF, a dedicated content extraction endpoint and an MCP server. If your work goes beyond plain HTML and you value polish and AI-native tooling, Ujeebu is the stronger foundation.